The founder of a Georgia investment firm that prosecutors call the largest Ponzi scheme in state history was sentenced this week to the maximum term the law allows. Todd Burkhalter, the chief executive of Drive Planning, drew 20 years in federal prison for a fraud that took roughly $380 million from more than 2,000 investors, many of them pressed to pull money out of retirement accounts and savings. Two of his top executives were sentenced earlier the same week, closing out a case that turned “guaranteed” returns into a cautionary tale for anyone approaching retirement.
The sentences handed down this week
A federal judge in Atlanta sentenced Burkhalter, 55, to 20 years in prison followed by three years of supervised release, and ordered him to pay more than $233 million in restitution to victims, the Justice Department said. The 20-year term is the maximum allowed by law. Prosecutors said he lured investors with promises of guaranteed returns and “ruthlessly encouraged them to deplete their kids’ college funds, take early distributions from retirement accounts, and borrow significant sums at high interest rates.”
Two other Drive Planning leaders were sentenced days earlier. David Bradford, 53, the company’s chief operating officer, received four years and three months after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and was ordered to pay about $4.3 million in restitution. Julie Edwards, 59, the chief administrative officer, was sentenced to two years after pleading guilty to laundering proceeds of the scheme, with $630,000 in restitution. All three sentences will be served without the possibility of parole, which no longer exists in the federal system.
Free retirement updates: Miss an enrollment or claim deadline and it may be gone. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter keeps readers ahead of the ones that matter. Get the free newsletter.
How the REAL and CORE Fund pitches worked
Between September 2020 and June 2024, Drive Planning marketed two headline products. The main one, the “Real Estate Acceleration Loan,” or REAL, was pitched as a bridge-loan opportunity that guaranteed investors a 10% return every three months, supposedly backed by real estate. To make the investments look safe, the company prepared fraudulent “collateral sheets” listing properties, some of which did not exist, with fictitious valuations. A second product, the “Cash Out Real Estate Fund,” promised a 22% annual return and was falsely described as pooled, government-protected, and fully collateralized.
None of it worked the way investors were told. Prosecutors said REAL operated as a Ponzi scheme from the start: within months of taking in money, Burkhalter was using new investors’ cash to pay earlier ones and to cover personal expenses, not to fund any real estate loans. The Securities and Exchange Commission, which brought a parallel civil case and obtained a restraining order in 2024, described the same pattern in its enforcement action against Drive Planning and Burkhalter. Even after the SEC began investigating, the company kept soliciting tens of millions of dollars more.
The retirement savings the scheme targeted, and what victims can recover
What makes the case a warning for older investors is where the money came from and where it went. Investors were urged to tap the accounts meant to carry them through retirement, and prosecutors detailed how their contributions funded a lavish lifestyle rather than any investment: roughly $2 million for a yacht, $2.1 million toward a luxury condo in Cabo San Lucas, about $800,000 on high-end vehicles, millions on private jet travel, and $320,000 on clothing, jewelry, and beauty treatments. Money that investors believed was collateralized by real estate was instead financing personal indulgences.
The case also illustrates how long a fraud can run before it collapses. Drive Planning took in money for nearly four years, and prosecutors said Burkhalter kept soliciting new investments even after federal regulators began asking questions in 2024, a sign that incoming cash, not any real return, was sustaining the operation. That is the defining trait of a Ponzi scheme: it survives only as long as new money keeps arriving and unravels the moment withdrawals outpace deposits, leaving the investors who joined last with the steepest losses. By the time the SEC obtained a restraining order in 2024, the money owed to victims far outstripped anything left to recover.
Recovery is now in the hands of a court-appointed receiver tasked with tracking down and selling assets to repay victims, but restitution orders totaling hundreds of millions rarely translate into full repayment, and many investors will get back only a fraction of what they put in. The mechanics of this scheme match the classic red flags regulators repeat: a guaranteed double-digit return, pressure to act quickly, claims that an investment is “government-protected” or fully collateralized, and encouragement to move money out of safe retirement accounts. Those promises are the opposite of how legitimate investing works, where higher returns come with higher risk and nothing is guaranteed. For a retiree weighing an unsolicited pitch, the surest protection is to verify that the seller and the product are registered before any money changes hands, exactly the step Drive Planning’s investors were steered away from taking.
This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by The Financial Wire editorial team.
More Financial Reading
- Bank statements: how long to keep them and when to toss them
- Adding someone to your bank account: tax traps and smart moves
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
