A federal jury in Kansas City has convicted a Missouri woman of draining more than $66,000 in Social Security benefits meant for her mother, who was living in Cuba with dementia while the money was quietly redirected to the daughter’s own spending. The verdict, returned this week, is a stark illustration of how easily benefits can be diverted when a relative sits on a beneficiary’s bank account and the agency is never told the recipient has moved abroad.
What the jury decided
Divianys Morales-Alvarez, 50, of Kansas City, was found guilty on all counts after a trial in U.S. District Court. According to the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General, the jury convicted her of two counts of theft of government funds, one count of bank fraud, and one count of aggravated identity theft. Jurors deliberated for about four hours before returning the guilty verdict, ending a trial that had opened days earlier.
The case was investigated by the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General, the watchdog charged with rooting out benefit fraud, and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Missouri. It stands as an example of the kind of long-running diversion that can go undetected for years when no one flags a change in a beneficiary’s circumstances.
Free retirement updates: Miss an enrollment or claim deadline and it may be gone. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter keeps readers ahead of the ones that matter. Get the free newsletter.
How the benefits were diverted
The beneficiary, identified in court records only as R.A., moved to Cuba upon her retirement in February 2020. The U.S. Treasury does not allow federal payments to be sent to individuals living in Cuba, but the Social Security Administration was never told of the move, so it kept depositing her monthly retirement benefits into a U.S. bank account on which her daughter was a joint owner. From February 2020 through September 2024, the agency sent more than $66,000 to that account. The scheme unraveled only in 2024, when the inspector general’s office received a report that a retirement beneficiary was living in Cuba in substandard conditions.
At trial, prosecutors described how little of the money reached the elderly, ailing mother it was intended for. Morales-Alvarez claimed she had sent $10,000 in cash to Cuba to care for her mother, but the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Missouri detailed in its account of the prosecution that the evidence showed she actually sent roughly $1,600 and four or five packages of clothing and supplies over the four-year span. The remaining funds, according to the government, went to her own benefit, including buying a vehicle and paying off delinquent real estate taxes.
The forged Treasury checks
The theft did not stop at the monthly benefits. While her mother was in Cuba, Morales-Alvarez also intercepted U.S. Treasury checks made out to R.A. for tax refunds and credits. Prosecutors said she forged her mother’s signature on the back of the checks, deposited them into the joint account, and then moved most of the money into her own savings account, spending it on restaurants, online streaming services, and car repairs. Those acts, layering identity theft and bank fraud on top of the benefit diversion, are what pushed the case beyond a simple failure to report a change of address and into a multi-count federal prosecution.
What the four convictions carry
The guilty verdict spanned four separate federal offenses, and each reflects a distinct piece of the scheme. The two theft-of-government-funds counts cover the diverted Social Security deposits themselves; the bank-fraud count reflects using the joint account to collect money the beneficiary was no longer entitled to receive; and the aggravated-identity-theft count stems from forging the mother’s signature on Treasury checks and depositing them as though she had endorsed them. Stacking those charges is what separated the case from an ordinary overpayment dispute, which the agency typically resolves by clawing the money back rather than prosecuting.
Sentencing will come later, after the court reviews the advisory federal guidelines that weigh factors such as the amount of loss, the vulnerability of the victim, and the defendant’s role. The statutory maximum of up to 30 years marks the ceiling rather than the likely term, but the multi-count conviction, layering identity theft and bank fraud on top of the benefit theft, gives the court a wider range than a single charge would. Restitution to the government for the more than $66,000 taken is a routine feature of these prosecutions as well, meaning the financial reckoning can follow long after the verdict.
A warning for families and joint account holders
The conviction carries real weight: under federal law, Morales-Alvarez faces a statutory maximum of up to 30 years in federal prison, though the actual sentence will be set by the court under the advisory guidelines. Beyond the courtroom, the case is a caution to families who manage money for aging parents. Benefits are supposed to stop when a recipient moves to a country where federal payments cannot legally be sent, and a beneficiary’s death or relocation must be reported promptly. Continuing to accept deposits that are no longer owed, and treating a shared account as a personal fund, is precisely the conduct that federal investigators pursue.
For older Americans, the episode underscores a quieter risk that the inspector general’s office repeatedly warns about: the person best positioned to steal a retiree’s benefits is often someone with legitimate access to the account. Regular review of where benefit deposits are going, and prompt reporting of any change in a beneficiary’s residence or status, remains the most reliable defense against the kind of years-long diversion a Kansas City jury has now punished.
This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI and reviewed by The Financial Wire editorial team.
More Financial Reading
- Adding someone to your bank account: tax traps and smart moves
- What really happens to your joint savings account when you die?
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
