Savers keeping cash in a standard deposit account are earning roughly one-tenth of what the best certificates of deposit offer. The FDIC’s national rate for savings accounts sits at 0.38 percent as of May 2026, while top-tier one-year CDs advertise yields near 4.40 percent. That gap, more than four full percentage points, represents a quiet but significant transfer of value from passive depositors to banks that benefit from cheap, sticky funding.
Why a Four-Point Spread Between CDs and Savings Rates Matters Right Now
The distance between what banks pay on liquid savings and what they offer for locked-in CDs is not accidental. Savings accounts and checking accounts make up the bulk of a bank’s deposit base. Keeping those rates low holds down the institution’s overall cost of funding. CDs, by contrast, carry fixed terms, typically six months to five years, that let banks match longer-duration assets on their balance sheets. By pricing CDs aggressively while leaving savings rates flat, banks extend the average maturity of their liabilities without raising expenses across their largest pool of deposits.
This strategy becomes visible when official rate tables are compared side by side. The FDIC tables dated May 2026 list the national savings rate at 0.38 percent. That figure is a volume-weighted average across all insured depository institutions, meaning it reflects what most Americans actually receive, not the promotional rates advertised by online-only banks. The same table breaks out CD tiers by maturity, showing how banks differentiate pricing to attract term deposits.
A Journal of Finance analysis examined how deposit rates respond to changes in benchmark interest rates. The research found that transmission from policy rates to liquid deposit products is far slower and smaller than transmission to term products like CDs. Banks, in other words, pass along rate increases to CD holders much faster than they do to savings account holders. That asymmetry is the engine behind the current spread.
FDIC Data and Fed Benchmarks Behind the 0.38 Percent Savings Rate
The 0.38 percent figure is not an estimate or a survey result. It comes directly from the FDIC’s methodology for calculating national deposit rates, which the agency uses to set rate caps for less-than-well-capitalized institutions. The FDIC computes a simple average of rates paid by all insured banks and savings associations, weighted by each institution’s domestic deposit volume. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis mirrors this data in its SNDR series, which tracks the national savings rate over time and confirms the figure has held near that level for several consecutive reporting periods.
Benchmark interest rates set by the Federal Reserve provide the ceiling against which all deposit pricing operates. The Fed’s H.15 Selected Interest Rates release tracks Treasury yields and other reference rates that banks use when setting CD terms. Treasury yield-curve data published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury show that short- and medium-term government securities have been trading well above the savings national rate, giving banks room to offer competitive CD yields while still earning a margin on the spread between what they pay depositors and what they earn on loans and securities.
For a household with $10,000 in a standard savings account, the difference between 0.38 percent and 4.40 percent is meaningful even over a single year. At the national savings rate, that balance would earn roughly $38 in interest before taxes. Placed in a one-year CD at 4.40 percent, the same money would generate about $440. Over multiple years, and especially for larger balances, the compounding gap becomes a substantial opportunity cost for households that leave their cash idle in low-yield accounts.
Who Benefits From the Gap-and Who Pays
From the bank’s perspective, low-yield savings accounts are a stable, inexpensive funding source. Many customers prioritize convenience, branch access, or bundled services over yield, and they rarely move their deposits in response to modest rate changes. That inertia lets banks maintain a wide margin between what they earn on assets and what they pay on transaction and savings deposits.
CD customers, by contrast, tend to be more rate sensitive. They compare offers across institutions, including online banks and credit unions, and are willing to lock up funds for a higher return. To attract this more mobile money, banks must keep CD rates closer to market benchmarks. The result is a two-tiered system: engaged, rate-shopping savers capture most of the benefit of higher interest rates, while passive savers effectively subsidize bank profits through below-market yields.
What Savers Can Do Now
The current environment rewards savers who are willing to trade some liquidity for yield. For emergency funds that may be needed at any time, a standard savings account or a high-yield online savings option still makes sense, even at relatively low rates. But for cash that is unlikely to be touched for six to twelve months, shifting a portion into CDs can dramatically increase earnings without taking on stock-market risk.
Households can also ladder CDs-spreading funds across multiple maturities-so that a portion of their money comes due every few months. This approach balances access and yield, and it reduces the risk of locking all funds into a single rate if market conditions change. The key, in any case, is recognizing that the headline rate on a primary bank account is rarely the best available option, and that the four-point spread visible in official data is not a temporary glitch but a structural feature of how banks price deposits.
Free for readers: The free Retirement Shield newsletter sends plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement — the scams to dodge, the benefits you’re owed, and what’s changing with Social Security and Medicare, a couple times a week. Get the free newsletter.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
