The federal government’s annual accounting of internet crime carried a stark message for older households this year. Fraud aimed at people in and near retirement is no longer a problem confined to the margins; it has become one of the largest and fastest-growing threats to the savings that older Americans spent decades building. The most alarming detail is not simply the size of the losses, but the speed at which they are rising.
A record year for elder fraud
Fraud can be measured in two ways: the number of people harmed and the total dollars taken. By both measures, older adults absorbed the heaviest damage of any age group last year, and the distance between them and everyone else grew wider rather than narrower.
According to the FBI’s 2025 Internet Crime Report, compiled by the bureau’s Internet Crime Complaint Center, Americans aged 60 and older reported roughly $7.7 billion in losses over the year, a 59% increase from the year before. That same age group filed 201,266 complaints, up about 37% and more than any other demographic the report tracks. Because the dollar losses climbed faster than the number of complaints, the average loss per victim grew heavier even as the crime reached more households.
Put another way, the problem is deepening on two fronts at once. More older Americans are being pulled into scams, and the typical amount each one loses is climbing as well. A threat expanding in both directions is far harder to contain than one that is merely spreading to more people or merely growing costlier for a stable pool of victims.
Free for readers: Scam calls targeting retirees change every week. The free Retirement Shield newsletter flags the ones going around and the one tell that stops each. Sign up free.
Why older Americans are the biggest target
The concentration of losses among retirees is not a coincidence. The FBI’s guidance on elder fraud explains that criminals deliberately single out older adults because they are more likely to have retirement savings, own their homes outright, and carry strong credit, the same signs of financial stability that make a successful theft so profitable. Many also came of age in an era that prized courtesy and taking people at their word, instincts a practiced con artist is skilled at turning against them.
Several other factors deepen the exposure. Some older adults live alone or feel isolated, which makes a warm voice on the telephone or an attentive new “friend” online harder to brush off. Others are less comfortable with the newest apps, payment tools, and digital warning signs, so an instruction to move money through a cryptocurrency machine, a wire transfer, or a stack of gift cards can seem like a reasonable request rather than a glaring red flag. Once money leaves an account through any of those channels, recovering it is extraordinarily difficult.
Criminals also tailor their scripts to the worries that weigh on older adults specifically. Threats about a suspended Social Security number, a Medicare card that must be replaced, a grandchild in legal trouble, or a suspicious charge on a bank account all borrow the authority of the institutions retirees depend on. The more official and urgent a demand sounds, the more effectively it short-circuits the pause that would otherwise expose it as a fraud.
How the data gets collected, and why it understates the damage
The published totals are built from complaints that victims or their relatives choose to submit to the government. The Internet Crime Complaint Center, reachable through the FBI’s ic3.gov reporting portal, collects those reports, routes them to investigators, and releases the combined figures each year. Because filing a complaint is voluntary, the numbers reflect only the fraud that people are willing and able to report.
That distinction is important. Federal officials have long acknowledged that a large share of elder fraud never surfaces at all. Some victims are ashamed to admit what happened, some do not recognize the scam until months later, and some simply never learn where to turn for help. For those reasons, the reported $7.7 billion is best understood as a floor rather than a ceiling, the visible slice of a considerably larger problem.
The undercount is not a minor footnote. Because reported cases represent only a fraction of the real total, the true annual loss almost certainly runs well beyond the published figure. It also suggests the fastest-growing schemes may be spreading even faster than the official data can capture, since the newest scams tend to be the ones victims recognize and report last.
What the figures mean for retirement savings
For a victim still in the workforce, a scam can be a painful setback that years of future earnings eventually repair. For someone already retired, the same loss is often permanent. A nest egg designed to stretch across two or three decades does not regenerate, and money surrendered to a fraudster is rarely returned even when the scheme is later uncovered and prosecuted. The gap between what is stolen and what is ever recovered is one reason elder fraud does such lasting harm.
The trajectory is the real warning. A 59% jump in a single year is not the profile of a steady, manageable threat; it is the profile of one that is accelerating, powered by convincing impersonation, instant payment systems, and criminal enterprises that treat the defrauding of retirees as a business.
The toll beyond the dollar figure
The financial loss, severe as it is, rarely captures the full harm. Victims often describe lasting anxiety, embarrassment, and a loss of confidence in their own judgment, and some retreat from the online tools and relationships a scam exploited. Families feel the strain as well, sometimes stepping in to cover expenses or taking over a relative’s finances after a large loss. Because so many victims stay silent, that emotional aftermath quietly reinforces the same underreporting that keeps the official totals lower than the reality.
Simple habits that blunt the risk
The scale of the problem can feel overwhelming, but the defenses that work are unglamorous and free. The single most protective habit is refusing to be rushed. Fraud schemes almost always manufacture urgency, insisting that an account will be frozen, an arrest is imminent, or an opportunity will vanish unless money moves immediately. Hanging up and calling the bank, agency, or family member back on an independently confirmed number defeats a large share of these scripts.
Equal caution belongs to the method of payment. Legitimate businesses and government offices do not demand payment in gift cards, cryptocurrency deposited at a kiosk, or wire transfers to unfamiliar accounts, and any such request is itself the warning sign. Talking through a large or unexpected transfer with a trusted person before sending it, freezing credit at the major bureaus, and reporting suspected fraud early all shift the odds back toward the household and away from the criminal enterprises now driving the annual totals higher.
Free for readers: Every year, billions in settlements and unclaimed money go unclaimed. The free Retirement Shield newsletter sends the real ones — with deadlines — a couple times a week. Get the free newsletter.
This article was researched and drafted with AI assistance and reviewed against the linked primary sources.
David M. Keller is a finance writer based in Columbus, Ohio, covering personal finance and consumer-focused economic topics. He earned his degree in journalism from Ohio University and began his career reporting on local business and economic trends for a regional media outlet. Since then, he has contributed to a variety of online publications, focusing on clear, practical coverage of topics such as cost of living, debt, and everyday financial decision-making.
