Workers who signed up to clean homes and run errands through the app Handy, expecting the paydays its ads promised, are now receiving checks from the Federal Trade Commission after regulators concluded those earnings claims did not hold up. The agency says it is returning more than $2.7 million to people who worked on the platform, money tied to advertising that overstated typical pay and to fees the company allegedly withheld without clear disclosure. The case sits at the intersection of gig work and retirement income, because a growing share of older Americans take on app-based side jobs to supplement Social Security, and the pay they are quoted is often the whole reason they sign on.
The earnings claims at the center of the case
Handy, which now does business as Angi Services, ran advertisements touting how much money workers could make on its platform. In a January 2025 action brought jointly with the New York Attorney General, the FTC alleged those figures did not reflect what the overwhelming majority of workers actually earned. Regulators also said the company failed to clearly disclose and explain a web of fees and fines, including charges levied against gig workers for jobs recorded as incomplete when a customer did not cancel properly. The result, the agency argued, was that money workers believed they had earned quietly shrank through deductions they were never plainly told about.
Those structural complaints matter beyond the dollar figures. When a platform advertises a headline wage and then reclaims part of it through penalties buried in the terms, a worker’s real hourly rate can fall well below what drew them in. The settlement required Handy to change that pattern, including obtaining a worker’s express, informed consent before charging any fee or fine and spelling out how to avoid such charges in the first place.
Free retirement updates: Every year, billions in settlements and unclaimed money go unclaimed. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter sends the real ones — with deadlines — a couple times a week. Get the free newsletter.
Who is getting a check and how much
The FTC is sending 62,893 checks totaling more than $2.7 million to eligible people who worked for Handy at some point between January 2019 and November 2024, according to the agency’s Handy Technologies settlement page. Eligibility is tied to that work history rather than to filing a claim, which means qualifying workers generally do not need to apply; the administrator identifies recipients from the company’s records. Anyone who receives a check is instructed to cash it within 90 days of the date printed on it.
The refund administrator for this case is Simpluris, and the FTC lists 1-833-647-9063 as the number for questions about a payment. As with every legitimate government refund, recipients are never asked to pay a fee or share bank-account credentials to release the money. Retirees who occasionally pick up gig work should be alert to that rule, because impersonation scams often follow closely behind well-publicized refund programs, using the real case name to make a demand for payment sound official.
Why the fine print matters for older gig workers
App-based work has become a common bridge for people easing out of full-time careers, offering flexible hours that fit around health, caregiving, or a fixed retirement schedule. That flexibility is precisely what makes transparent pay so important: a worker weighing whether a shift is worth the effort is relying on the quoted rate to be honest. When penalties and fees erode that number after the fact, the math that justified the job falls apart, and the worker has already spent the time.
The Handy settlement is a signal that regulators are treating gig-platform earnings claims with the same scrutiny long applied to other advertising. For workers, the practical takeaway is to read the fee and cancellation terms before accepting jobs on any platform, and to keep records of assignments completed and amounts promised. Documentation is what turns a vague sense of being shortchanged into a provable claim, and it is often the difference between recovering money and absorbing the loss.
Confirming a payment is real
Workers who think they qualify but have not seen a check, or who want to verify a payment before cashing it, can consult the FTC’s refund program answer page or contact the administrator directly at the number the agency publishes. The FTC’s guidance is consistent across its cases: a real refund never requires an upfront payment, and any message asking for one is a scam trading on the settlement’s name. Checking the agency’s own page before acting on any call, text, or email remains the surest defense.
This article was researched and drafted with AI assistance and reviewed against the linked primary sources.
More Financial Reading
- Adding someone to your bank account: tax traps and smart moves
- The ideal retirement withdrawal rate so your savings actually last
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
