A pitch that promises cash today with “no monthly payments” and “not a loan” can sound like relief to a retiree sitting on home equity but short on income. Federal regulators have been warning for more than a year that these home-equity “investment” contracts often cost more than the traditional loan they are pitched to replace, and the bill usually comes due all at once, at the worst possible moment — when the house is sold.
How a home-equity investment contract is structured
In a home-equity contract, sometimes called a home-equity investment or HEI, a company pays a homeowner a lump sum upfront in exchange for a share of the home’s future value. Rather than monthly payments and interest like a mortgage or home-equity loan, the homeowner repays the company in a single lump sum when the contract ends — typically when the home is sold, when the term expires (often 10 to 30 years out), or when another triggering event occurs — and that repayment is calculated using a formula tied to the home’s appreciation, according to the CFPB’s Issue Spotlight on home equity contracts, published Jan. 15, 2025. Because there is no stated interest rate, companies marketing these products routinely describe them as an investment rather than a loan, a framing the CFPB has directly challenged.
Free retirement updates: Keep more of your Social Security and savings with plain-English updates on the changes, deadlines, and costly mistakes retirees miss. Subscribe free.
Why “not a loan” does not mean cheaper
The CFPB’s market overview found that home-equity contracts are frequently more expensive than a traditional home-equity loan or line of credit, even in scenarios where the home’s value stays flat or falls, because the repayment formula and origination-style fees built into these contracts can outweigh the interest a homeowner would have paid on a conventional loan of the same size. The absence of a labeled interest rate makes that comparison harder for a homeowner to make in the moment, since there is no single number to weigh against a bank’s advertised rate — the true cost only becomes clear once the appreciation-based repayment is calculated at settlement. The CFPB has also taken the legal position that these contracts are covered by the Truth in Lending Act despite being marketed as investments, filing an amicus brief arguing that the disclosure and consumer-protection rules that apply to home loans should not be avoidable simply by renaming the product.
The balloon payment that can force a sale
Because the entire repayment is due in one lump sum rather than spread across years, homeowners can face a bill running into the hundreds of thousands of dollars when the contract term ends or a triggering event occurs, and a homeowner without other resources to cover that amount can be pushed to sell the home or refinance under pressure. For a retiree on a fixed income, refinancing that balloon into a new mortgage is not always realistic, since qualifying for new financing typically requires income the household may no longer have. The CFPB’s review found some consumers were surprised by the size of the final repayment, reported confusion about how the appreciation-based formula worked, and in some cases found selling the home was their only practical way to satisfy the contract.
What regulators say is missing from these deals
Unlike a mortgage, which comes with standardized federal disclosures that let a borrower compare the annual percentage rate across lenders, home-equity contracts currently lack a uniform disclosure format, which the CFPB says makes it difficult for homeowners to compare one company’s offer against another’s, let alone against a traditional loan. Disputes over how a company values the home at the start and end of the contract have also surfaced as a recurring source of consumer complaints, since a higher valuation at the start, or a lower one at the end, can each work against the homeowner depending on how the formula is written. Some homeowners also reported difficulty refinancing their existing first mortgage once a home-equity contract was in place, since the contract effectively creates a competing claim on the property that a new lender has to account for.
Questions worth asking before signing
Anyone weighing one of these offers has reason to ask for the effective cost in dollar terms under a few different home-value scenarios — flat, modest appreciation, and strong appreciation — rather than accepting a sales pitch built around the absence of a monthly payment. Comparing that projected repayment against what a traditional home-equity loan or reverse mortgage would cost over the same period, and involving a housing counselor or attorney before signing a multi-decade contract secured by the home, are both steps consumer advocates and the CFPB point to as ways to avoid discovering the true cost only when the house is finally sold.
This article was researched and drafted with the assistance of AI and reviewed by The Financial Wire editorial team.
More Financial Reading
- What really happens to your joint savings account when you die?
- Bank statements: how long to keep them and when to toss them
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
