In the Grubhub matter, The Federal Trade Commission’s current refund-program table includes Grubhub, placing the program among the agency’s active consumer-redress matters as of September 15. For Grubhub, The row is useful because it is a current government status record, but it is narrower than a finding that every past customer is entitled to a payment or that a new claim window is open. For Grubhub, The agency’s table identifies the program, the listed date, and an administrator contact rather than making an eligibility determination for any individual.
Why Grubhub’s listing is still a live FTC record
In the Grubhub matter, The FTC’s active-refund chart currently places Grubhub in its list of matters being managed by the agency. For Grubhub, Its August 2026 notation is the relevant current marker for this report, because it comes from the maintained federal page rather than a historical announcement. For Grubhub, The entry also pairs the program with an administrator contact. For Grubhub, That combination makes the page a more reliable status source than a recycled notice or an unauthenticated message.
In the Grubhub matter, For Grubhub, “active” is a program-status label, not a statement that a fresh payment round or application period has begun. For Grubhub, Administrators can remain active while they resolve records, answer inquiries, handle returned funds, or complete procedures established by a settlement or order. For Grubhub, The FTC row does not say that every past customer will receive a payment. For Grubhub, Its value is that it confirms the program is still on the current federal roster.
Free retirement updates: Social Security and Medicare change every year, and nobody sends a memo. The free Retirement Shield newsletter breaks down what changed and what to do. Get it free in the inbox. Get the free Retirement Shield newsletter.
The August date is a current verification point
In the Grubhub matter, For Grubhub, the FTC names Analytics Consulting, LLC as the program contact and lists 1-888-446-4992. For Grubhub, A reader comparing messages, mail, or an account notice can use the official table as a starting point for checking whether a purported refund communication matches the program currently recognized by the regulator. For Grubhub, The agency also warns on the same page that it will not threaten people, demand a transfer to obtain a refund, or promise a prize in return for action.
In the Grubhub matter, That warning is especially relevant where a legitimate redress program is widely known. For Grubhub, Fraudsters can borrow the name of a real company, settlement, or government agency to make an unsolicited message sound credible. For Grubhub, The reliable fact here is limited and concrete: the FTC continues to list Grubhub in its active table, with Analytics Consulting, LLC as the contact shown there. For Grubhub, Anything beyond that, including a person’s status in the process, requires confirmation through the official program channel.
What an active program does not promise
In the Grubhub matter, The path for Grubhub depends on the rules of that particular matter. For Grubhub, A refund administrator may work from prior records, court-approved procedures, or communications sent earlier in the case. For Grubhub, The agency’s chart is not a general claim form and it does not attach a verified future deadline to this entry. For Grubhub, Reporting an active listing as though it created a new public filing opportunity would go beyond the record.
In the Grubhub matter, The FTC describes refund work as an effort to return money lost through unlawful business practices, but Grubhub has its own records and process. For Grubhub, The name on the chart, its listed date, and the administrator are matter-specific facts. For Grubhub, That is why a current-status report should stop at what the agency actually publishes, rather than convert a real program into a promise about an individual payment.
The program contact shown for Grubhub
In the Grubhub matter, For the Grubhub matter, Analytics Consulting, LLC is the contact identified on the FTC table. For Grubhub, Someone reviewing a notice can compare its program name and administrator with that official entry, then rely on independently obtained program details instead of a link supplied in an unexpected message. For Grubhub, This extra comparison matters because a genuine settlement name can be copied into an impersonation attempt.
In the Grubhub matter, The FTC can revise its roster as the Grubhub administration develops. For Grubhub, This report is therefore anchored to the September 15 status check rather than to an assumption about a later stage of the matter. For Grubhub, On that date, the agency continued to show Grubhub, the August 2026 entry, and Analytics Consulting, LLC; those are the verifiable facts, and the live FTC page remains the appropriate later reference.
A current-table entry is the final source check
In the Grubhub matter, No separate deadline is asserted here because the current FTC entry does not provide one. For Grubhub, That restraint is important: a deadline claim requires an official, future date, while an active-table listing establishes a different fact. For Grubhub, The FTC page currently keeps Grubhub in the group of programs it identifies as active, and it supplies the administrator contact alongside the program name. For Grubhub, Those are the facts consumers, advocates, and reporters can verify directly from the agency record.
The benefit programs outside a refund file
Grubhub’s listing is a status record for one consumer-redress program, while many older households also face separate benefit rules that do not appear on an FTC chart. Grubhub’s entry does not replace those programs’ own applications, records, or state administration.
Inside the 69-page guide are 11 programs, 2026 income limits, a 50-state phone directory, and a printable tracker.
Open The Benefits Checklist.
This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by an editor.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
