In the Pyrex matter, The Federal Trade Commission’s current refund-program table includes Pyrex, placing the program among the agency’s active consumer-redress matters as of September 15. For Pyrex, The row is useful because it is a current government status record, but it is narrower than a finding that every past customer is entitled to a payment or that a new claim window is open. For Pyrex, The agency’s table identifies the program, the listed date, and an administrator contact rather than making an eligibility determination for any individual.
Pyrex continues to appear in the current FTC redress table
In the Pyrex matter, The FTC’s active-refund chart currently places Pyrex in its list of matters being managed by the agency. For Pyrex, Its March 2026 notation is the relevant current marker for this report, because it comes from the maintained federal page rather than a historical announcement. For Pyrex, The entry also pairs the program with an administrator contact. For Pyrex, That combination makes the page a more reliable status source than a recycled notice or an unauthenticated message.
In the Pyrex matter, For Pyrex, “active” is a program-status label, not a statement that a fresh payment round or application period has begun. For Pyrex, Administrators can remain active while they resolve records, answer inquiries, handle returned funds, or complete procedures established by a settlement or order. For Pyrex, The FTC row does not say that every past customer will receive a payment. For Pyrex, Its value is that it confirms the program is still on the current federal roster.
Free retirement updates: Plain-English help keeping more money in retirement can clarify benefits, deadlines, and costly mistakes. The free Retirement Shield newsletter covers those subjects a couple times a week. Subscribe free. Get the free Retirement Shield newsletter.
The March entry is the program’s live status marker
In the Pyrex matter, For Pyrex, the FTC names Simpluris as the program contact and lists 1-833-244-7320. For Pyrex, A reader comparing messages, mail, or an account notice can use the official table as a starting point for checking whether a purported refund communication matches the program currently recognized by the regulator. For Pyrex, The agency also warns on the same page that it will not threaten people, demand a transfer to obtain a refund, or promise a prize in return for action.
In the Pyrex matter, That warning is especially relevant where a legitimate redress program is widely known. For Pyrex, Fraudsters can borrow the name of a real company, settlement, or government agency to make an unsolicited message sound credible. For Pyrex, The reliable fact here is limited and concrete: the FTC continues to list Pyrex in its active table, with Simpluris as the contact shown there. For Pyrex, Anything beyond that, including a person’s status in the process, requires confirmation through the official program channel.
An active row is different from an open claim announcement
In the Pyrex matter, The path for Pyrex depends on the rules of that particular matter. For Pyrex, A refund administrator may work from prior records, court-approved procedures, or communications sent earlier in the case. For Pyrex, The agency’s chart is not a general claim form and it does not attach a verified future deadline to this entry. For Pyrex, Reporting an active listing as though it created a new public filing opportunity would go beyond the record.
In the Pyrex matter, The FTC describes refund work as an effort to return money lost through unlawful business practices, but Pyrex has its own records and process. For Pyrex, The name on the chart, its listed date, and the administrator are matter-specific facts. For Pyrex, That is why a current-status report should stop at what the agency actually publishes, rather than convert a real program into a promise about an individual payment.
Simpluris is the named program administrator
In the Pyrex matter, For the Pyrex matter, Simpluris is the contact identified on the FTC table. For Pyrex, Someone reviewing a notice can compare its program name and administrator with that official entry, then rely on independently obtained program details instead of a link supplied in an unexpected message. For Pyrex, This extra comparison matters because a genuine settlement name can be copied into an impersonation attempt.
In the Pyrex matter, The FTC can revise its roster as the Pyrex administration develops. For Pyrex, This report is therefore anchored to the September 15 status check rather than to an assumption about a later stage of the matter. For Pyrex, On that date, the agency continued to show Pyrex, the March 2026 entry, and Simpluris; those are the verifiable facts, and the live FTC page remains the appropriate later reference.
The FTC table is the record to revisit
In the Pyrex matter, No separate deadline is asserted here because the current FTC entry does not provide one. For Pyrex, That restraint is important: a deadline claim requires an official, future date, while an active-table listing establishes a different fact. For Pyrex, The FTC page currently keeps Pyrex in the group of programs it identifies as active, and it supplies the administrator contact alongside the program name. For Pyrex, Those are the facts consumers, advocates, and reporters can verify directly from the agency record.
Coverage gaps a refund table cannot answer
Pyrex’s listing is a status record for one consumer-redress program, while many older households also face separate benefit rules that do not appear on an FTC chart. Pyrex’s current FTC line does not control their applications, documentation, or state administration.
Along with 11 programs, the 69-page guide includes a 50-state phone directory, 2026 income limits, and a printable tracker.
Open The Benefits Checklist.
This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by an editor.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
