In the Restoro-Reimage matter, The Federal Trade Commission’s current refund-program table includes Restoro-Reimage, placing the program among the agency’s active consumer-redress matters as of September 15. For Restoro-Reimage, The row is useful because it is a current government status record, but it is narrower than a finding that every past customer is entitled to a payment or that a new claim window is open. For Restoro-Reimage, The agency’s table identifies the program, the listed date, and an administrator contact rather than making an eligibility determination for any individual.
Restoro-Reimage remains on the FTC’s active-program roster
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, Restoro-Reimage appears in the FTC’s maintained inventory of active refund programs, where the agency assigns the matter a March 2026 listing date. For Restoro-Reimage, Unlike a years-old settlement article, that listing is a live status signal from the regulator. For Restoro-Reimage, The same row supplies an administrator contact, creating a traceable path back to the program record.
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, The Restoro-Reimage row does not state that a new distribution has started or that all former customers are part of a payment process. For Restoro-Reimage, “active” can reflect administrative work after earlier case steps rather than a newly created consumer opportunity. For Restoro-Reimage, It can include record processing, payments already underway, or follow-up work by the administrator. For Restoro-Reimage, The precise claim supported here is only that the FTC has not removed the program from its active table.
Free retirement updates: Social Security and Medicare change every year, and nobody sends a memo. The free Retirement Shield newsletter breaks down what changed and what to do. Get it free in the inbox. Get the free Retirement Shield newsletter.
The March listing provides today’s verification trail
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, For Restoro-Reimage, the FTC names Rust Consulting, Inc. as the program contact and lists 1-844-590-1102. For Restoro-Reimage, A reader comparing messages, mail, or an account notice can use the official table as a starting point for checking whether a purported refund communication matches the program currently recognized by the regulator. For Restoro-Reimage, The agency also warns on the same page that it will not threaten people, demand a transfer to obtain a refund, or promise a prize in return for action.
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, That warning is especially relevant where a legitimate redress program is widely known. For Restoro-Reimage, Fraudsters can borrow the name of a real company, settlement, or government agency to make an unsolicited message sound credible. For Restoro-Reimage, The reliable fact here is limited and concrete: the FTC continues to list Restoro-Reimage in its active table, with Rust Consulting, Inc. as the contact shown there. For Restoro-Reimage, Anything beyond that, including a person’s status in the process, requires confirmation through the official program channel.
Program activity does not create a blanket refund promise
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, Rules for consumer redress are not interchangeable, and Restoro-Reimage is no exception. For Restoro-Reimage, A program may rely on settlement terms, existing purchaser information, a prior claim process, or another case-specific procedure. For Restoro-Reimage, The federal chart does not provide a universal deadline for each row. For Restoro-Reimage, Because no open future deadline is shown for Restoro-Reimage, none is asserted in this article.
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, The FTC’s broader refund mission provides context, while the Restoro-Reimage listing supplies the narrow evidence. For Restoro-Reimage, Program dates, administrators, and participant records belong to the particular redress matter. For Restoro-Reimage, Keeping those distinctions intact prevents a useful official table from being overstated as a guarantee that a consumer has a payment waiting.
Rust Consulting is the contact the agency identifies
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, Rust Consulting, Inc. is the administrator named alongside Restoro-Reimage on the current FTC chart. For Restoro-Reimage, That field is useful for a documented comparison with correspondence already received, especially where the program name appears in a mailer or account message. For Restoro-Reimage, A phone number or website introduced through an unsolicited contact should not displace the regulator’s own entry as the starting point for verification.
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, FTC refund rows can be updated as case administration progresses. For Restoro-Reimage, The Restoro-Reimage status described here was checked September 15, when the table continued to display its March 2026 listing and Rust Consulting, Inc. contact. For Restoro-Reimage, The government page, rather than a cached copy of this article, is the record that should govern a subsequent status check.
The official roster is the source-led check
In the Restoro-Reimage matter, No separate deadline is asserted here because the current FTC entry does not provide one. For Restoro-Reimage, That restraint is important: a deadline claim requires an official, future date, while an active-table listing establishes a different fact. For Restoro-Reimage, The FTC page currently keeps Restoro-Reimage in the group of programs it identifies as active, and it supplies the administrator contact alongside the program name. For Restoro-Reimage, Those are the facts consumers, advocates, and reporters can verify directly from the agency record.
The household programs behind the paperwork
Restoro-Reimage appears in a federal redress record, while retirement and household-support programs operate under separate eligibility systems. Those systems are governed outside the Restoro-Reimage FTC entry.
The 69-page document covers 11 programs and supplies state phone contacts, 2026 income limits, and a tracker for printed records.
Open The Benefits Checklist.
This article was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by an editor.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
