California has enacted Senate Bill 876, the Disaster Recovery Reform Act, which doubles the penalties insurers face for violating claims-settlement rules during a declared emergency and requires restitution to be paid to policyholders when violations occur. Senator Steve Padilla authored the bill, and Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara backed it. Its provisions begin phasing in on January 1, 2027, with further provisions following on January 1, 2028, so nothing in the law changed for policyholders on the day the Governor signed it. The measure applies in California only.
One bill, two signing dates on the Department’s own pages
The California Department of Insurance, which lists its announcements in a press-release index, published two releases that cover the bill. Release 034, indexed on September 28, 2026, announces that the Governor signed the Disaster Recovery Reform Act into law and gives an effective date of January 1, 2027. Release 035, dated September 30, 2026, covers a wider package of consumer-protection bills and lists SB 876 among them, with an initial implementation date of January 1, 2027 and additional provisions on January 1, 2028.
The two releases therefore disagree about when the signature happened, and neither carries a chapter number. The Legislature’s own bill-status page could not be retrieved for this article because the site’s robots rules block automated readers, so the chapter number and a single authoritative signing date remain unconfirmed here. The enactment itself rests on the Department’s two announcements. Either way, the signing date is not the date any penalty changes: the earliest date either release gives for an operative change is January 1, 2027.
The doubling applies only inside a declared emergency
Release 034 states that the law doubles penalties during declared emergencies for violations of fair claims practice rules, and release 035 describes the same change as doubling penalties when insurers violate claims-settlement laws during declared emergencies. Both framings tie the higher penalty to the emergency declaration. Neither release describes a change to the penalty level for claims-settlement violations outside a declared emergency, and neither states the old or new penalty amounts, so this article does not supply a figure.
That conditionality matters for how the headline reads. A policyholder whose claim is mishandled in an ordinary year is not described as facing a different penalty regime. The enhanced exposure for insurers attaches to the periods when claim volumes spike, such as after a wildfire or a major storm.
Restitution is directed to policyholders themselves
Both releases say insurers must provide restitution directly to policyholders when claims-settlement violations occur. The Department’s description of the bill says the payments are for unfair settlement practices. Senator Padilla’s office, in its page on the bill, likewise says insurance companies must pay restitution directly to policyholders when they engage in unfair claims settlement practices, and quotes Padilla: “Wildfire survivors need to be supported throughout their recovery.”
The same page quotes Commissioner Lara: “Wildfire survivors need the power to recover on their terms, not on insurance companies’ terms.” The sources read for this article do not say how restitution amounts will be calculated, who will determine them, or how quickly they must be paid, and those mechanics are not described here.
Recovery plans, adjuster reports and coverage options travel with the penalties
Release 034 lists several other duties in the bill. Insurers must develop disaster recovery plans that the Department reviews. When an adjuster on a claim is reassigned, the insurer must send a status report within 15 days. Policyholders must be offered extended replacement-cost and living-expense coverage options, and building-code upgrades are to be applied at the time of rebuild rather than at the time of loss. Release 035 adds that insurers must offer policyholders expanded policy limits, aimed at reducing delays and underinsurance.
The Department calls the package the most comprehensive update to California’s claims-handling laws in more than 30 years and says it is meant to serve as a national model. In release 034, Lara said: “No family who has lost everything should have to fight their insurance company to get the benefits they paid for.”
Which provisions start in 2027 and which in 2028
Neither release assigns individual provisions to the 2027 or the 2028 date. Whether the penalty doubling, the restitution requirement, the 15-day adjuster reports or the coverage offers sit in the first or the second phase is therefore not stated in the Department’s announcements, and the bill’s chaptered text, which this article could not read, would be the place to settle it.
The bill sits beside several others that release 035 lists as signed the same day, including AB 1795 on smoke-damage standards for wildfire recovery, AB 1680 on FAIR Plan oversight and SB 1209 on examination compliance enforcement. Those are separate bills with their own provisions. In release 035, Lara said of the package: “When Californians pay their premiums, they deserve more than a policy on paper. They deserve protection that shows up when disaster strikes.”
Property-tax relief applications for homeowners and renters
The Senior Property Tax & Home-Cost Relief Kit is written for homeowners and renters who face a property-tax relief application, an exemption, a freeze, a circuit-breaker deadline or a new assessment. It also covers people looking for heating, cooling or home-repair help. The problem it addresses is simple: the programs differ by state and county, and the paperwork is easy to lose track of.
The Senior Property Tax & Home-Cost Relief Kit is an 11-page kit that lays out the 5 kinds of property-tax relief and includes an application log and renewal calendar for tracking each filing.
Open the 5 kinds of property-tax relief and the renewal calendar for a homeowner or renter filing →
This article was produced with AI assistance and checked against the linked sources; dates, quotes and provisions are taken from those documents.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
