A settlement website built for cash withdrawals at non-bank ATMs describes its covered period as October 24, 2007, through August 14, 2026. The wording on the site says that anyone who withdrew cash from a non-bank ATM and was assessed a surcharge inside those dates “could” get money from the settlement, which is why coverage is a question of whether a person fits and not a settled fact. Visa and Mastercard are the card networks tied to the settlement.
What the administrator’s banner says
The settlement website, NonBankATMSurchargeSettlement.com, carries a page description that reads in full: “If You Withdrew Cash from a Non-Bank ATM and Were Assessed with a Surcharge Between Oct. 24, 2007, and Aug. 14, 2026, You Could Get Money from This Settlement.” The page title is “Non Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement,” and its keywords include “Visa Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement” and “File a Claim.”
That sentence is the only statement of eligibility available from the administrator’s page on a plain read, and every element of this article’s coverage description comes from it. The word “could” is the administrator’s own, and it keeps the headline’s “may be covered” conditional: the banner names who might receive a payment, not who will.
Three conditions packed into one sentence
The banner joins three requirements. The first is a cash withdrawal, as distinct from a purchase or a deposit. The second is that the withdrawal happened at a non-bank ATM, a label that the page uses without defining in the text that could be read. The third is that a surcharge was assessed on that withdrawal, again within the dates stated.
A withdrawal that satisfies only some of those conditions falls outside the sentence as written. A cash withdrawal at an ATM with no surcharge does not match the banner, and a surcharge outside the window does not match it either. The page text that could be read does not say how the administrator will test those conditions, what records it will accept, or whether a claimant must show a particular card type. Those points would sit in the notice and claim form, which the page body did not reveal.
A window that spans nearly nineteen years
The start date of October 24, 2007, and the end date of August 14, 2026, put the covered period at close to nineteen years. That is a long period for a single class description. The end date also sits in the recent past, so the window as worded on the banner is already complete and is not a stretch of time still running.
The banner treats the whole stretch as one class period. It does not, in the text that was readable, split the dates into separate sub-periods or separate amounts, and no per-person figure appears anywhere in it.
What the page body did not show
The administrator’s page body is rendered by JavaScript, and a plain read returns only the page’s metadata and a tracking tag. A second try at the site’s home path returned the same description and nothing more. As a result, this article states no fund total, no per-person amount, no claim deadline and no court, because none of them appeared on any administrator page that could be read. A reader who wants those terms has to open the site in a full browser, where the claim details load.
The same gap explains why the story is scoped to coverage only. Without a readable deadline, no date for acting is offered here, and none should be inferred from other settlements.
Visa and Mastercard on the notice
The administrator’s keywords name Visa, and the headline’s pairing of Visa and Mastercard comes from a third-party settlement tracker that lists both card networks as defendants. That tracker is a secondary summary, not a court or administrator document, and it is cited here only for the identity of the two networks.
The administrator’s own banner is the controlling text for coverage. Its period, October 24, 2007, through August 14, 2026, and its condition of a surcharge assessed on a non-bank ATM cash withdrawal, are as stated on NonBankATMSurchargeSettlement.com.
Reading a class window before a claim form loads
A class description built around a surcharge and a date range turns on records. Bank statements, receipts and card histories carry the dates that decide whether a withdrawal sits inside the window. The notice and the claim form then say what proof the administrator wants.
The Settlement & Refund Recovery System includes a step-by-step filing walkthrough and a claim log and payment tracker, two tools for working through a notice once its requirements are visible and for recording each submission afterward.
Open the step-by-step filing walkthrough for the non-bank ATM surcharge settlement →
AI assistance was used in drafting; the covered period and the limits of what the administrator’s site shows were checked directly before publication.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
