Eight people have been indicted in St. Louis on allegations that they deposited U.S. Treasury checks with a combined value of $3.4 million that had been stolen from the mail, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri. Prosecutors say two of the defendants, Samuel Stewart and Royce Finger, recruited homeless people to carry out the deposits and coached them before taking them into banks.
All eight defendants have appeared in court and pleaded not guilty, the office said in its September 24 announcement. An indictment is a formal accusation, not a finding of guilt, and the allegations below are the government’s account of the case.
What mailed checks are exposed to between the Treasury and the mailbox
People who still receive paper payments from the federal government, whether a tax refund, a benefit payment or another disbursement, are the ones with the most at stake in a case like this. A check that is stolen from a mailbox or a mail stream has already left the agency’s hands. The payee finds out only when the payment does not arrive, or when the agency reports that it was cashed.
The practical question for those households is how to keep a payment from leaving through a mail slot at all. A reader who gets a federal payment by check has two things to settle: whether the payment can be moved to a bank account by direct deposit, and what to do the moment a payment is late. The questions are separate, and the first one removes most of the exposure that the second one has to clean up.
Rules and scams around federal payments keep changing, and The Retirement Money Brief explains one change each weekday, who it affects and what to do.
Get the free weekday brief → Free from RetireShield. Unsubscribe anytime.
How the scheme is alleged to have worked
The IRS Criminal Investigation division, which investigated alongside federal partners, published its own copy of the release. It describes a division of labor. Stewart and Finger, the release says, were the two who found people willing to walk into a bank with a check, told them what to say and then took them to the branches. The people carrying the checks were not the ones who had taken the paper out of the mail.
That structure matters to anyone who relies on a mailed federal payment. A Treasury check is a government instrument, and banks tend to treat it as a safe deposit. Prosecutors say the group leaned on that trust, putting checks in front of tellers through people who looked like ordinary account holders making ordinary deposits.
The checks were not the group’s own. According to the IRS Criminal Investigation account, they were stolen in four states: Florida, Minnesota, California and Tennessee. The theft of the checks and their deposit in St. Louis were separate steps, which is part of why a mailed payment can disappear long before a recipient knows to ask about it.
The $937,809 check and the $597,890 that left the bank
The largest single check named in the case was for $937,809. The IRS Criminal Investigation release says the deposit of that one check caused the withdrawal of $597,890. The release does not describe that sum as recovered, and the amounts should be read as what prosecutors say moved through the accounts, not as a loss figure a court has decided.
The $3.4 million total is also an aggregate. It adds up the face value of the Treasury checks that all eight defendants are accused of depositing, so it is not a sum attributed to Stewart and Finger alone, and it is not the amount actually paid out. The $937,809 check is the single biggest item inside it. A check of that size from the Treasury would ordinarily be a payment of unusual scale, which is part of why the withdrawal figure stands out in the charging announcement.
Charges and the penalties on the table
The charges described in the IRS Criminal Investigation release include bank fraud and aggravated identity theft. Bank fraud carries a statutory maximum of 30 years in prison, and aggravated identity theft carries a mandatory two years that runs on top of any other sentence. Those are the maximums the law allows, not predictions of what any defendant would receive if convicted, and no defendant has been convicted.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office said all eight have pleaded not guilty. The case now moves through the federal court in St. Louis, and the next steps will be set by the court. Neither agency has announced a trial date in its release, and the release does not say where the stolen checks were drawn from beyond the four states.
Who investigates and where similar cases are posted
The case sits within a long list of financial-crime prosecutions that IRS Criminal Investigation posts. Its press release index collects those announcements by date, and it is where later developments in this case, such as a plea or a sentence, would appear if the agency chooses to publish them.
For readers who rely on checks, the lesson in the prosecutors’ account is narrow. The alleged scheme did not depend on breaking into bank systems. It depended on paper that was out of its owner’s control and on a teller’s willingness to accept a deposit from a person who appeared to be a legitimate payee.
Moving a federal check payment off the mail and reporting one that never came
The steps for anyone who still gets a federal payment on paper are the same ones the agency issuing the payment will walk through. Ask that agency, whether it is the Social Security Administration, the IRS or another office, whether the payment can be switched to direct deposit, and have the bank routing and account numbers on hand when asking. Direct deposit takes the check out of the mailbox, which is the point of exposure in this case.
When a payment is late, the order matters. Contact the paying agency first, since only the agency can say whether a check was issued and whether it has been cashed, and ask for a replacement if it was not received. Tell the bank if a check that was meant to arrive was cashed by someone else. Keep the dates: when the payment was due, when it should have arrived and when the agency was told.
The IRS Criminal Investigation index linked above is the place to follow this St. Louis case, and the E.D. Mo. announcement is the one to check for the court’s next move. Both are sources the agencies update themselves.
More Financial Reading
- How many CDs can you park at 1 bank? FDIC rules you must know
- Adding someone to your bank account: tax traps and smart moves
- The ideal retirement withdrawal rate so your savings actually last
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by The Financial Wire’s editorial team.
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
