Three nursing homes in the Buffalo area paid a combined $9 million to resolve government fraud claims tied to how they billed Medicaid and Medicare, New York Attorney General Letitia James announced on August 17, 2026. The facilities named in the case are Safire Rehabilitation of Northtowns, Safire Rehabilitation of Southtowns, and Williamsville Suburban Nursing Home. Unlike many fraud settlements that close without any finding of fault, the three homes admitted wrongdoing as part of the resolution. For residents and families who depend on Medicaid or Medicare to pay for nursing home care, the case is also a reminder that the data a facility reports to the government can shape more than its own bottom line.
A $6 Million Medicaid Settlement Split Between Albany and Washington
The larger of the two settlements resolves allegations that the Safire homes submitted false data to inflate the reimbursement rates New York’s Medicaid program paid them. Under the terms of the settlement, the three facilities paid $6 million on the Medicaid portion of the case — $3.6 million going directly to New York State and the remaining $2.4 million paid to the federal government, which covers a share of every state Medicaid program’s cost. That split is standard for Medicaid fraud recoveries because Medicaid is funded jointly by state and federal taxpayers; when a nursing home is found to have overbilled the program, both funding sources are repaid in the same settlement, in proportion to what each contributed. Because nursing home Medicaid spending draws on that shared pool of public money, overbilling by a handful of providers ultimately competes with the dollars that fund care for other residents statewide.
The Safire homes also admitted wrongdoing as part of the deal, according to the attorney general’s office — a detail that sets this case apart from the more common settlement in which a company pays money while denying liability. “Nursing homes that commit financial fraud are stealing funds meant to provide care for our most vulnerable,” Attorney General James said in announcing the resolution.
Free retirement updates: Social Security and Medicare change every year, and nobody sends you a memo. Our free Retirement Shield newsletter breaks down what changed and what to do. Get it free in your inbox.
A Separate $3 Million Medicare Resolution, Same Conduct
On top of the Medicaid settlement, the Safire homes paid an additional $3 million to the federal government to resolve separate allegations that the same billing practices defrauded Medicare, the federal insurance program most Americans rely on after age 65. Combined, the two resolutions bring the total repayment to $9 million under a settlement agreement covering both programs. Medicaid and Medicare are billed differently even inside the same nursing home: Medicaid typically covers long-term stays for residents who have exhausted their savings, while Medicare usually pays for a limited window of rehabilitative care following a hospital stay. Because the underlying conduct touched both kinds of billing, the case produced two separate payments to two different government payers rather than a single combined figure.
How a Twice-a-Year Rate Calculation Was Gamed
New York’s Department of Health sets a nursing home’s Medicaid reimbursement rate using data the facility itself reports about how much rehabilitative care its residents need, and that data determines the rate paid on claims for roughly the following six months. A joint investigation by the attorney general’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of New York found that, from July 2016 through December 2020, the Safire homes exploited that calendar: during the assessment windows that fed the rate-setting formula, the homes inflated how much rehabilitation certain residents needed, then reduced the rehabilitation those same residents actually received once the assessment period had passed and no longer affected the rate.
U.S. Attorney for the Western District of New York Michael DiGiacomo said the settlement “reinforces our commitment to safeguarding federal funds and ensuring seniors receive the care they deserve.” The audit behind the case was led by Auditor-Investigator Rebecca Whitescarver under the supervision of Regional Chief Auditor Mary Henry, with the settlement itself handled by Special Assistant Attorneys General Jill D. Brenner and Amanda L. Raimondi under Buffalo Regional Director Paul C. Parisi.
Cases built this way — inflating what a patient needs during the window that sets a payment rate, then scaling back the actual care once the rate is locked in — are a recurring pattern in nursing home fraud, and federal fraud enforcement actions against health care providers compiled by the inspector general’s office at the Department of Health and Human Services document dozens of similar cases against providers nationwide each year.
What the Case Adds to a Family’s Nursing Home Research
As part of the settlement, the three homes must adopt new procedures to document residents’ care needs accurately and make sure Medicaid-covered residents receive the services their assessments say they require. That obligation matters beyond the fraud case itself: the staffing levels and resident-assessment data nursing homes report to state and federal regulators also feed into Medicare’s Care Compare tool, the federal government’s public search tool for comparing nursing homes by location on staffing, health inspections, and quality measures on a five-star scale. The settlement does not allege that the specific figures published on Care Compare were falsified, and the case centers on Medicaid and Medicare billing rather than the public ratings site. But it is a reminder that a facility’s self-reported numbers are only one input for a family choosing where a parent or spouse will receive care, and that inspection histories and enforcement actions like this one are worth checking alongside the published star ratings before signing an admission agreement.
The case began after a whistleblower filed a complaint in December 2020 under the qui tam provisions of the New York and federal False Claims Acts, which let private individuals sue on the government’s behalf and share in money recovered. New York’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, which conducted the audit work behind the case, is funded three-quarters by a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and one-quarter by New York State for the current fiscal year, a funding structure the attorney general’s office says supports its ongoing investigations of nursing home fraud statewide.
This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by The Financial Wire editorial team.
More Financial Reading
- The ideal retirement withdrawal rate so your savings actually last
- Bank statements: how long to keep them and when to toss them
Warren Cohen is a finance writer based in Phoenix, Arizona, covering personal finance topics including credit, banking, and beginner investing. He earned his degree in business administration from Arizona State University and began his career working in consumer finance, where he gained direct experience with lending and credit systems. He now writes for personal finance websites and fintech platforms, focusing on clear, practical content that helps readers make informed financial decisions.
