Thousands of car owners who paid for extended warranties that never delivered real coverage are getting a second chance at partial recovery. The Federal Trade Commission is mailing 9,074 refund checks totaling more than $186,000 to consumers deceived by American Vehicle Protection Corporation, a Florida-based operation that sold sham auto warranties through aggressive telemarketing. Combined with an earlier distribution of more than $223,000, the agency has now sent more than $449,000 in checks to 18,255 consumers caught up in a scheme that collected more than $6 million since 2018.
Why a second round of AVP refund checks matters right now
The first batch of refunds went out in October 2024, but not every eligible consumer received payment. This second mailing targets buyers the FTC identified after the initial distribution, expanding the pool of people who can recover at least a fraction of what they lost. Each check is cashable within 90 days, so recipients who delay risk losing the money entirely.
The gap between total losses and total refunds tells its own story. American Vehicle Protection and its operators collected more than $6 million from consumers, yet the combined refund payouts barely clear $449,000. That means the average recipient is getting back only a small fraction of the $2,800 to $3,400 they originally paid for warranties that the FTC described as deceptive. The refund program returns pennies on the dollar, but it represents the only direct financial remedy available to victims after years of federal litigation in the Southern District of Florida under civil action number 0:22-cv-60298-RAR.
Consumers who are unsure whether they are included in the refund program can review the FTC’s dedicated refund information page, which explains eligibility, payment timing, and what to do if a check is lost or expired. The agency notes that it never charges a fee to issue refunds, a key point for people wary of being drawn into yet another scam while trying to recover from the first one.
One likely side effect of the public notices is that consumers who bought the warranties and never realized they were fraudulent may now file fresh complaints. The FTC directs consumers to reportfraud.ftc.gov for reporting scams, and the renewed attention could drive a measurable increase in submissions from people who only now understand the coverage they purchased was worthless. While new complaints will not reopen the closed AVP case or generate additional court-ordered refunds, they can help enforcement officials identify similar telemarketing operations that may still be active.
How a $6.6 million judgment and lifetime bans ended the AVP operation
The FTC filed its original complaint in February 2022, alleging that the defendants called hundreds of thousands of consumers, including many registered on the Do Not Call Registry. Sales representatives falsely told buyers their warranties provided “bumper to bumper” protection and implied the plans were backed by car dealers or manufacturers. In reality, the policies carried severe coverage gaps, claims were often denied, and the company had no affiliation with any automaker or dealership.
By March 2023, federal court orders imposed a lifetime industry ban on the operators and entered a monetary judgment of $6.6 million. That judgment far exceeds the refund total, reflecting the difference between what the court determined the defendants owed and what the FTC could actually recover and distribute. The case file in the FTC’s legal library details how the defendants allegedly used misleading scripts, spoofed caller ID information, and high-pressure tactics to push consumers into buying coverage on the spot.
The court orders not only shut down American Vehicle Protection’s operations but also barred the individual operators from ever working in the extended vehicle warranty industry again. The permanent injunctions prohibit them from making misrepresentations about any goods or services, from violating telemarketing rules, and from accessing or using customer lists generated by the scheme. These provisions are designed to keep the same people from reappearing under a new business name and targeting another wave of car owners.
What affected car owners should do next
Consumers who receive a refund check should deposit or cash it before the 90‑day deadline printed on the payment. Those who believe they were harmed but do not receive a check can still file a fraud report, which helps regulators spot patterns even if it does not result in additional AVP refunds. Car owners considering any new service contract should independently verify who is selling the plan, confirm coverage directly with the administrator listed on the contract, and be skeptical of unsolicited calls that pressure them to “renew” expiring warranties.
The American Vehicle Protection case underscores a broader reality: even when regulators win large money judgments, the funds actually recovered may cover only a fraction of what consumers lost. For the thousands of drivers now getting small checks in the mail, the payments cannot fully undo the damage, but they do mark a rare instance in which a fraudulent telemarketing operation has been dismantled, its leaders permanently sidelined, and at least some money returned to the people who paid for promises that never matched the fine print.
Free tool for readers: You check your blood pressure — when did you last check your retirement? You can get your free Retirement Safety Score in about five minutes, with no sign-up to see it.
David M. Keller is a finance writer based in Columbus, Ohio, covering personal finance and consumer-focused economic topics. He earned his degree in journalism from Ohio University and began his career reporting on local business and economic trends for a regional media outlet. Since then, he has contributed to a variety of online publications, focusing on clear, practical coverage of topics such as cost of living, debt, and everyday financial decision-making.
