Energy tax credits can reduce the cost of legitimate home improvements, but they also give dishonest preparers a plausible-sounding number to insert on a return. A new Alabama complaint alleges that one preparer’s version reached thousands of filings and almost $70 million in losses.
The accusation is about volume as well as false eligibility
Michael Shine operates Shine’s Professional Services in the Birmingham area. Federal prosecutors have charged the matter by complaint, which means the allegations have not been proven and Shine is presumed innocent.
The Justice Department said July 30 that Shine filed or caused the filing of literally thousands of returns claiming energy tax credits it describes as baseless and fraudulent. The agency placed the alleged loss at almost $70 million.
The public summary does not identify every credit, client or tax year involved. It does establish the core claim and its legal status: an accusation in a complaint, not a conviction or final loss judgment.
Legitimate credit rules are narrower than a sales pitch. The IRS’s current Residential Clean Energy Credit guidance says qualified property must have been installed, not merely purchased, and the credit is generally nonrefundable. Eligible costs are claimed on Form 5695 and need supporting records. Those requirements make an invoice, installation date and property address central evidence, rather than optional paperwork added after a refund is questioned.
Free retirement updates: Want plain-English help keeping more of your money in retirement? The free Retirement Shield newsletter covers scams, benefits, and money many retirees may be owed, a couple times a week. Subscribe free.
A large refund is not proof that a credit belongs on the return
Tax software can calculate a credit once information is entered, and the IRS may issue a refund before every fact is examined. Neither event validates an improvement that was never made, an amount that lacks an invoice or a property that does not meet the rule.
Older homeowners are frequent targets for high-refund pitches because they may have recently replaced windows, heating equipment or other expensive systems. A preparer can take a real purchase and stretch it into an unsupported credit, or claim work the taxpayer never described.
The strongest defense is a return-to-receipt comparison before signing. The product description, installation date, property address, invoice and proof of payment should support the exact entry. A taxpayer should ask which form and rule authorize the credit rather than accepting “the software allows it.”
The taxpayer keeps responsibility after hiring a professional
The IRS’s current fraud alert cautions that the taxpayer remains responsible for information on the return even when another person prepares it. That makes a preparer’s promise to absorb any audit risk financially misleading.
An improper credit can lead to repayment of the refund, interest and penalties. A criminal case against a preparer does not automatically erase a client’s tax balance. The government may distinguish between a client who supplied honest records and one who knowingly joined a false claim, but the return still needs correction where the numbers are wrong.
Copies matter. A complete file should include the signed return, all schedules, the preparer’s identifying number, engagement paperwork and the records given to the office. Paying by traceable method also establishes who prepared the work and when.
Warning signs appear before the return is transmitted
A preparer who bases the fee on refund size has an incentive to make the refund larger. Other danger signs include refusing to sign the return, directing the refund into an unfamiliar account, inventing household or business facts, and preventing the taxpayer from reviewing the completed forms.
A credit should not appear as a surprise after a short interview. Energy provisions generally depend on specific property and spending details. If the preparer did not ask for them, there is no obvious factual basis for a large claim.
Taxpayers who discover a questionable filing should preserve records and obtain independent tax advice before changing anything. An amended return may be appropriate, but the correct response depends on the facts, timing and whether identity theft or return-preparer misconduct is involved.
A transcript from the IRS can help identify what the agency received, particularly when a preparer did not provide a complete copy. Taxpayers should compare it with the return they reviewed and any refund deposited. Differences deserve immediate, documented follow-up.
Refund proceeds should always land in an account the taxpayer recognizes. A preparer’s temporary bank product may be legitimate when properly disclosed, but routing money elsewhere without clear authorization adds another layer of risk.
The alleged $70 million began one signature at a time
The scale in the Alabama complaint can obscure the household exposure. Each return belongs to an individual taxpayer who signed under penalties of perjury and may now need to show what was purchased and why the credit was claimed.
Energy incentives can be valuable when the home, equipment and tax year qualify. The protective move is not to avoid them; it is to demand a documented path from receipt to form. The complaint against Shine shows how quickly unsupported entries can multiply when no one pauses at that final review.
This article was researched and drafted with AI assistance and reviewed against the linked primary sources.
More Financial Reading
- How many CDs can you park at 1 bank? FDIC rules you must know
- Adding someone to your bank account: tax traps and smart moves
David M. Keller is a finance writer based in Columbus, Ohio, covering personal finance and consumer-focused economic topics. He earned his degree in journalism from Ohio University and began his career reporting on local business and economic trends for a regional media outlet. Since then, he has contributed to a variety of online publications, focusing on clear, practical coverage of topics such as cost of living, debt, and everyday financial decision-making.
